Prediction of Thomas Haldin vs Libor Pimek Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Haldin vs L. Pimek

Thomas Haldin

SWE

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

138

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Libor Pimek

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

138

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Haldin 1 - 0 Pimek

They have played 3 sets in total, with Thomas Haldin winning 2 and Libor Pimek winning 1. The last match between Thomas Haldin and Libor Pimek was at the Estoril CH, 03-10-1988, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Thomas Haldin getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Haldin	1
Pimek	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(QF) Estoril CH(10-03-88)

Stats

Thomas Haldin

Libor Pimek

T. Haldin vs L. Pimek H2H Profile

T. Haldin	Stats	L. Pimek
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
45.16% (28-34)	Career Total W/L	52.32% (158-144)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Haldin vs L. Pimek Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thomas Haldin has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Libor Pimek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thomas Haldin, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Libor Pimek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Thomas Haldin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Libor Pimek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Thomas Haldin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Libor Pimek winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Thomas Haldin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 21/24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/6). Libor Pimek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 99/77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Thomas Haldin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Libor Pimek has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thomas Haldin winning 1 times and Libor Pimek being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Thomas Haldin winning 2 and Libor Pimek winning 1.
The last match between Thomas Haldin and Libor Pimek was at the Estoril CH, 03-10-1988, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Thomas Haldin getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thomas Haldin has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Libor Pimek has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thomas Haldin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Libor Pimek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Thomas Haldin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Libor Pimek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Thomas Haldin vs Libor Pimek Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Haldin vs L. Pimek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Haldin	Stats	L. Pimek
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Haldin Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki CH - 13-11-1989
R3 Aki RahunenA. Rahunen	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Brest CH - 23-10-1989
R3 Veli PaloheimoV. Paloheimo	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Nicosia CH - 09-10-1989
QF Srinivasan VasudevanS. Vasudevan	L	6-4 1-6 6-4	Stats
R4 Mihnea Ion NastaseM. Ion	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
R3 Michael DanielM. Daniel	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

L. Pimek Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
San Marino - 27-07-1992
R1 Mikael TillstromM. Tillstrom	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
Stockholm - 21-10-1991
R1 Aaron KricksteinA. Krickstein	L	6-2 2-6 7-6(6)	Stats
Toulouse - 30-09-1991
R1 Thomas EnqvistT. Enqvist	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Prague - 05-08-1991
R2 Arnaud BoetschA. Boetsch	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
R1 Pedro RebolledoP. Rebolledo	W	6-4 6-1	Stats

View All

T. Haldin vs L. Pimek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Haldin	Stats	L. Pimek
45.16% (28/34)	YTD Win/Loss	52.32% (158/144)
46.15% (66/77)	Sets Win/Loss	49.86% (364/366)
49.66% (655/664)	Games Win/Loss	49.66% (3323/3368)
33.33% (3/6)	Hard Win/Loss	51.22% (42/40)
46.67% (21/24)	Clay Win/Loss	56.25% (99/77)
50.00% (4/4)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.48% (17/25)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
355.18	Average Opponent Rank	390.17
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	26.32% (5/14)
0% (0/0)	Masters W/L	42.11% (8/11)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	50.00% (2/2)
15.38% (2/11)	Main Tour W/L	54.15% (111/94)
53.06% (26/23)	Challenger W/L	58.18% (32/23)
47% (28/60)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (149/274)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	35% (9/26)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
52% (11/21)	Deciding Set Win %	62% (56/90)
83% (23/19)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (148/129)
17% (23/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (148/18)
23% (39/9)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (154/30)